Policy or Political Problem?

We have public policy problems, caused by political problems. The budget, the deficit, and the debt are all public policy problems with multiple solutions. In fact most of our problems in domestic policy, foreign policy, or culturally have multiple solutions. However, our political institutions have been unable to address our public policy problems, and innovated solutions have been ignored. Why is that?

Ezra Klein writes that “Americans live in a new economic reality, and it’s long past time that Washington did, too. In the short term, the nation faces a jobs crisis; in the long-term, a debt crisis. Each crisis presents opportunities to overhaul the state for a new era. Instead, Democrats and Republicans are using both to double down on the same stale ideas they were pushing in 2005, 2001, 1997 and even earlier.” Klein then lays out a case for some interesting and innovative solutions for both long term and short term problems.

Klein goes on to say that “You wouldn’t know that such options even exist from the state of our cramped debates about jobs and the deficit. But those stilted discussions are a function of the political environment, not the policy options.” While he has laid out a case for our policy problems, he didn’t really address our political problems. Without addressing our political problem the policy problems are going to continue to be exasperated. These political problems manifest in political polarization and filter bubbles.

Political polarization has been increasing steadily over the last thirty years, and this has had a dramatic effect on public policy. Political scientists Keith Poole and Christopher Hare have published research that shows that Congress is more politically polarized that at any time since the late 19th Century. This polarization has happened due to redistricting efforts that has protected incumbents and the party in power, and the conservative movement that has moved the Republican Party further to the right. The political parties are so far apart, that compromises become politically toxic.

According to a report by the Los Angeles Times, the 112th Congress, measured by votes taken, bills made into laws, nominees approved, is on pace to be one of the least productive sessions of Congress ever. Nothing is getting done. From January until the end of May, 16 piece of legislation have been signed into law — compared with 50 during that period in 2010. In 2007, when there was also an ideological split government (although the dynamic was different), 28 pieces of legislation became law. The Republican controlled House or Representatives passes conservative pieces of legislation, that is then stalled in the Democrat controlled Senate. Compromise seems unattainable.

So, what is the solution to our political problem? A public policy failure. For example, one of the reasons that the reforms needed o repair the financial system was not achieved was because the system did not collapse, it was propped up. There was therefore not a demand for real reform. If the debt ceiling negotiations fall through, then we could see a real public policy failure. If America defaulting on its debt obligations begins to affects people in a real way, then you might see a demand for political change. The other solution is a political failure. But, what would that look like?

2 responses to “Policy or Political Problem?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: